Answer:
<em>Brave New World</em> is a dystopian novel from 1931. The author of the novel is Aldous Huxley, while the main idea explored is the government's strict (and often unnecessary) control of the people's lives.
Bernard Marx is an Alpha male, but he does not meet the criteria due to his physical stature. He lacks self-esteem and has untypical opinions on common topics. He shares his surname with Karl Marx, a German writer and the author of<em> Capital</em>, where he criticizes the capitalist society. Bernard would desperately like to be accepted by others, which is the very reason why he does not fit in his society.
Lenina Crowne is a woman that Marx likes. She works as a vaccination worker. Lenina also deviates from certain cultural norms, such as a common belief that you should date one man for several months. Her opinions completely oppose orthodox conventions, which is why the readers often sympathize with her.
Helmholtz Watson, a lecturer at the College of Emotional Engineering, is a man completely unmotivated to do his job. He is a good writer, but he believes that he does not use his talent for the right purposes. He is a friend of Bernard's, and they both seem to be the outsiders of the World State. They, however, criticize the World State in completely different ways - Helmholtz is more philosophical in his complaints, while Bernard's complaints are trivial.
Money would lead to more children, who would then starve in even more miserable conditions.
Answer:
A: metaphors
C: contradictions
E:loaded language
F:imagery
Explanation: I JUST TOOK THE TEST!!
Hello, This question is incomplete. The full question is:
When we arrived, however, the library was closed. About a dozen people were milling about the glass front doors, wearing puzzled expressions and muttering with frustration
Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding for the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?
A. The quality is good; the evidence supports the claim by using a personal example to show that there is clear community demand for the library's services
B. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the claim by showing a need, but it would be better if the writer had asked each person why they were frustrated.
C. The quality is poor; the evidence does not give an exact statistic to explain how many of the people were at the library to attend a program.
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Answer:
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Explanation:
In order to present a good support of evidence, the author must present data about the programs offered by the library, their quality, availability and the relevance they present. In order to know about these data, it would be important that the author had heard the public's opinion about the library's programs, since, as users, the public can offer a view with less bias.
