1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aksik [14]
3 years ago
13

One of the main arguments between the North and the South prior to the Civil War was tariffs. Tariffs were taxes people had to p

ay. The federal government put tariffs on goods brought to this country from foreign countries. Southerners felt these tariffs were unfair because their economy relied on foreign goods, so they had to pay more than Northerners did. Southerners believed that these tariffs violated the Declaration of Independence. their states' rights. the Civil Rights Act of 1866. the First Amendment.
History
2 answers:
Anna007 [38]3 years ago
7 0
A major point of contention between Southern States and Northern States prior to the Civil War was the issue of states rights to determine their own policies in regards to many issues. One of these issues was the issue over tariff's in regards to imported goods. Therefore, southerns would believe that these tariffs violated their state's rights to determine economic policy for themselves.
lara [203]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) state's rights.

Southerners believed that these tariffs violated the state's rights.

We are specifically talking about the Tariffs of 1828, that US Congress passed because this piece of legislation helped to solidify the industry in the Northern states. The problem was that southerners depended so much on slavey and imports from Europe, so they called this legislation "Tariff of Abominations." US President Andrew Jackson signed into law this legislation that put high taxes to imports that were from  40 to 45% South Carolina was one of the southern states that strongly opposed to the implementation of those tariffs.

You might be interested in
which of the following is not associated with the war of 1812 a]the battle of new orleans b]'the star spangled banner' c}the che
Mkey [24]
D. The Battle of Little Big Horn. This one was fought more after the War of 1812.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The seventh amendment promises
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

The Seventh Amendment (Amendment VII) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment codifies the right to a jury trial in certain civil cases and inhibits courts from overturning a jury's findings of fact.

Explanation:

:))

8 0
3 years ago
Which term best describes the foreign policy of both China under the Qing Dynasty and Japan under the Tokugawa Shogunate?
lilavasa [31]

Answer: Isolationism is the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What influence did trade have within different empires in africa asia and the mediterranean
iren2701 [21]

In the 1500s, a complex change community connected Europe, Africa, and Asia. a good deal of this change was surpassed via the Arabian Peninsula in the center East. Ships from China and India brought their cargoes of spices, silks, and gemstones to ports at the purple Sea.

The trade routes of ancient Africa played a crucial position within the financial system of many African Empires. items from Western and important Africa have been traded to far-flung locations like Europe, the center East, and India. the principal items traded were gold and salt.

The slave exchange had devastating results in Africa. monetary incentives for warlords and tribes to interact inside the slave alternate promoted an ecosystem of lawlessness and. Depopulation and a continuing worry of the captivity made economic and agricultural development almost not possible all through plenty of western Africa.

Learn more about trade here:

brainly.com/question/17727564

#SPJ9

6 0
1 year ago
How did countries around the world respond to the holocaust after world war 2
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

In the decades since the Holocaust, some national governments, international bodies and world leaders have been criticized for their failure to take appropriate action to save the millions of European Jews, Roma, and other victims of the Holocaust. Critics say that such intervention, particularly by the Allied governments, might have saved substantial numbers of people and could have been accomplished without the diversion of significant resources from the war effort.

Explanation:

Hope this helps lol

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All of the statements below are historically accurate. Mark the item if the event it describes helped lead to war between Britai
    5·1 answer
  • Why were the citizen of roman empire so drawn into christianity
    6·1 answer
  • Difference between a president and a prime minister in iraq
    12·1 answer
  • 20 fact about the American story civil war
    11·1 answer
  • Select the nautical regions
    5·1 answer
  • Why was congress willing to fund the space race
    9·1 answer
  • A written code of laws and rights issued by the government is called a​
    5·1 answer
  • The Battle of Shiloh eventually resulted in...
    11·2 answers
  • Which political party was Abraham Lincoln part of?
    14·1 answer
  • What effect did New Mexicans' service in the Spanish-American War have? O A. It gave New Mexicans the right to vote for U.S. pre
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!