In response to Henry Clay's plea for the North and the South to reach an agreement, Webster supported this plea while Calhoun was refused to compromise Southern demands.
As a result of increased tension between the South and the North over abolition in 1850, Henry Clay appealed for both sides to reach an agreement.
<h3>What was Calhoun's response to this plea?</h3>
- John Calhoun refused to compromise on the South's demands to permit slavery in the western territories.
- He also demanded that escaped enslaved people should be captured from the North and returned to the South.
While Calhoun was refusing to negotiate, Webster called for an agreement between the North and the South because he claimed that the South would not be able to secede peacefully.
In conclusion, Webster supported Henry Clay and Calhoun did not.
Find out more on John Calhoun at brainly.com/question/7242818.
Explanation:
The meaning of the document can change over time, depending on the context in which it is read. However, the basic principles of the charter – such as the right to a fair trial, freedom of speech, and protection from arbitrary imprisonment – have remained unchanged for centuries.
Answer:
Lend-Lease and Military Aid to the Allies in the Early Years of World War II. During World War II, the United States began to provide significant military supplies and other assistance to the Allies in September 1940, even though the United States did not enter the war until December 1941.
In response to the U-Boat attacks, Allied merchant ships sailed in groups, called convoys, escorted by warships. ... By the end of 1917, 3,170 Allied and neutral ships, totaling nearly six million tons, were sunk.
The Allies' defence against, and eventual victory over, the U-boats in the Battle of the Atlantic was based on three main factors: the convoy system, in which merchant ships were herded across the North Atlantic and elsewhere in formations of up to 60 ships, protected, as far as possible, by naval escorts
The fraction is written properly in both "A. Sharon walked three-fourths of a mile" and "C. Sabrina shared <span>two-thirds of the pizza" since they should be hyphenated. </span>
Answer:
1. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - gave Johnson authority to retaliate militarily in Vietnam.
2. Cold War - bloodless conflict between the United States and the Soviets.
3. Marshall Plan- gave financial aid to European nations.
4. Bay of Pigs - the Cuban invasion that attempted to overthrow Castro.
5. Potsdam meetings - determined the future of occupied nations following World War II.
6. Vietnamization - withdrawal of United States troops from Vietnam.
Explanation:
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President John the power to take all necessary steps to retaliate any armed attack by the Vietnamese communist regime against the military of the United States. It aimed at preventing any large scale aggression or damage to the US military by Vietnam.
The Cold War occurred right after the end of the Second World War. It was an ideological conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. The US wanted to expand capitalism while Soviet Union tried to expand Socialism.
The Marshall Plan was a plan to give billions of dollars as financial aid to European nations which were devastated during the Second World War. The Marshall Plan was also called as the Economic Recovery Act of 1948.
The Bay of Pigs invasion was an attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro's communist regime in Cuba. This invasion program was headed by President John F Kennedy in 1961.
The Potsdam meeting was a conference among the Big Three nations- Soviet Union, Britain and United States. It aimed at determining the fate of occupied European nations after the end of the Second World War.
Vietnamization was a policy which aimed at withdrawing the United States' military from Vietnam and transferring the power of governance to South Vietnam in 1970.
