U.S. participation in NATO was a break with tradition, since the United States for the first time set itself up to automatically get involved in foreign conflicts--something that was very unnerving for a country of people who for most of American's history had been very isolationist.
In the us military after the war
Answer:
In my opinion
World War I is the climax of all the contradictions that exist in European countries. Before the outbreak of World War I the situation in the European region had heated up, there had been competition between countries in Europe. At that time Europe was divided into two rival camps. The existence of a Triple Agreement from France et al and the Triple Alliance from Germany et al. With the breakup of two camps, from 1908, several crises had tested competing alliances, pushing Europe closer to the War. Specifically, the Bosnian event involved Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Serbia. This incident contained a lot of material which eventually waged a war in 1914.
The South (Confederacy's) economy was dependent on being able to trade and sell their cotton for money (as their most produced crops are cotton & tobacco.) Also, the South's infrastructure & factories were not built up, and they did not have the economic nor the population superiority as of the North. This led to not only the blockade, but the South's inability to deal with the blockade in a large scale. While the South tried to get smugglers and blockade runners to help them trade, they were not able to bring cotton out in a large scale, and it soon led to the destruction of the South's economy.
~
Answer:
i think democrat but im not sure
Explanation: