Answer:
THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH AND SET AN EXAMPLE FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES..
THEN THEY WILL BE LIKE A LEADER FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES
FOR QUESTION 2
Roosevelt described his style of foreign policy as "the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis." As practiced by Roosevelt, big stick diplomacy had five components. First it was essential to possess serious military capability that would force the adversary to pay close attention. At the time that meant a world-class navy. Roosevelt never had a large army at his disposal. The other qualities were to act justly toward other nations, never to bluff, to strike only when prepared to strike hard, and the willingness to allow the adversary to save face in defeat.
The idea is negotiating peacefully but also having strength in case things go wrong. Simultaneously threatening with the "big stick", or the military, ties in heavily with the idea of Realpolitik, which implies a pursuit of political power that resembles Machiavellian ideals.It is comparable to gunboat diplomacy, as used in international politics by the powers.
Explanation:
HOPE I HELPED
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
DESPERATELY TRYING TO LEVEL UP
✌ -ZYLYNN JADE ARDENNE
Nationalism is the identification with one's own nation and to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations. Hence the effect is negative.
<h3>Effect of nationalism on networks, production and distribution</h3>
Nationalism affect networks, production and distribution in such a way that a significant proportion of consumers will not be willing to buy imported produce from countries that are in conflict with theirs. Hence, those whose ethnocentric and economic-centric relationship are strong would exhibit this trait.
The implication is that networking of good to to such country will be distorted, low production may set in, and by extension, distribution may need to follow other channels.
Therefore, the effects will be enormous and very negative to the producing countries.
learn more about nationalism: brainly.com/question/1287645
Answer:
1. the modernizing of technology
2. machines could replace human workers
3. Companies earned more money
Explanation:
1. The modernizing of technology made it easier for businesses to access and use them, which in turn made labor much less.
2. Machines could now replace workers which meant that companies could pay a one time price for basically lifetime workers .
3. Companies made more money in the fact they never had to pay workers
ever.
Answer:
A) Union
Explanation:
Sherman was a Union general, or supportive of Lincoln's presidency and the North in the Civil War.
