Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
English-speaking British colonies in North America – the conflict is known as the French and Indian War. In English-speaking Canada – the balance of Britain's former North American colonies – it is called the Seven Years' War
Options:
A. one-party system
B. Judeo-Christian Communist
C. republic
D. multi-party system
E. atheist
The answer is option A "one-party system." The Soviet Union was known to have a one-party system. A one-party system is a state with one political party and that political party has a right to form or make changed to the government.
Hope this helps.
Gonna go ahead and say that it could be C. Extent of Trade Routes
1.a dog sheds it’s fur to adapt to the heat
2.a camel stores water in its hump due to the heat in the desert