Answer:
- The new political climate in the United States Supreme Court meant that a federal child labor ban could stand constitutional muster.
Explanation / historical context
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression. However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government. So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges. The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire. If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices. This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.
As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act. So the court packing plan became unnecessary to his purposes.
Child labor was regulated by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. In a unanimous decision in <em>United States v. Darby Lumber Co</em>. (1941), the US Supreme Court upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The Court ruled that Congress had power, under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, to regulate employment conditions.
your answer I think would be B
It depends on one's beliefs. They were they same but after slavery.
Answer:
Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher, from Oklahoma, was a leader in the nationwide Civil Rights Movement. Fisher dreamed of being a lawyer, but Langston University, an All-Black college she was attending, did not have a law school. Colleges and universities were segregated, so Fisher was not allowed to attend a school in Oklahoma that had a law school. She decided to apply for the law program at the University of Oklahoma anyway. The university denied her admission due to the segregation laws. She filed a lawsuit against the school. Amos T. Hall and Thurgood Marshall were her lawyers. Jake Simmons helped fund her case. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. The case, Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, declared that she must be allowed the same opportunities for education as everyone else. After three years, in 1949, she was allowed to attend the University of Oklahoma.
Fisher and fellow African American students, although allowed to attend universities in Oklahoma, were still segregated within the schools. The school forced Fisher to sit in a chair with a chain around it and a sign that read “Colored.” Black students were also made to sit in a different part of the cafeteria and in a separate, back part of the classroom. An African American student from Oklahoma, George W. McLaurin, took this issue to court. In 1950, the US Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents that this was not allowed.
With the efforts of Oklahomans and people nationwide that participated in the Civil Rights Movement, our society changed so that all people, no matter the color of their skin, can be together whether in school, at home, or in public places. However, today people do not always treat each other with fairness and respect. Bullying continues to be a problem in school, but you can continue to help the Civil Rights Movement by making a friend with a classmate who may be different from you or standing up to someone who may be bullying a classmate or friend.
Explanation:
I'm from Oklahoma, So I know all about Oklahoma History!!
<span>Struggled to find meaning in a chaotic world. (Apex)</span>