1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erica [24]
3 years ago
10

Nathanson considers the following modification of the principle of lex talionis: a punishment should produce an amount of suffer

ing in the criminal which is equal to the amount suffered by the victim. Do you think this is a plausible principle? What objections does nathanson offer to the principle?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alisiya [41]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

Lex talionis means treating the criminals in the way the criminals treated the victims. In means giving the same sufferings to others as others have caused them suffering.

This principle is not plausible because according to Nathanson, it will make us to act in an immoral way with others. We cannot hijack the hijacker's plane because they did to us. We cannot spy on others because others are spying on us. Nathanson objected the principle because he believes that it is not possible to measure sufferings of others as different people suffered differently. So we cannot bring equal suffering.  

You might be interested in
An unusually small-sized _____ may be an indicator of a susceptibility to ptsd.
alex41 [277]
The answer is hippocampus


8 0
3 years ago
The assembly called for a "bill of rights" that would list U.S. citizens': immunities and freedoms privileges and responsibiliti
Vlada [557]
The assembly called for a bill of rights would list U.S. Citizens' Immunities and freedoms

The assembly would list the citizen's immunities from the potential harm that may happen to them through various conduct whether from the government or other citizen, and list the freedoms that they have within the country the moment they regain a status as a citizen.
3 0
3 years ago
The marriage provision in the statute of frauds is inapplicable in agreements that involve:
MArishka [77]
The correct answer is: <span>only mutual promises to marry.

</span>The Statute of Frauds when it comes to marriage states <span>that any </span>marriage<span> contract must be in writing. The main purpose of having a written </span><span>marriage contracts is for the division of both married partners' assets. However a marriage provision or written contract in the </span>Statute of Frauds is inapplicable in agreements between partners that involve mutual promises to marry.
5 0
3 years ago
Jack registered as a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War. He believes that it is wrong to take human life. He is willi
andrew-mc [135]

Answer: Post-conventional moral reasoning

Explanation:

Post-conventional moral reasoning was proposed by Lawrence kohlberg, he explains is as the ethical reasoning of moral actors who carry our decision based on rights, duties, values or even principles that are general. In most cases this principles are open to criticism as individuals hold various opinion to issues and possess different sense of judgement, this makes the separable from authorities. Although Jack's choice may be opinion of some people they still create room for critisim as every does not see war as just taking human life especially when fighting as a soldier for the cause of your country.

6 0
3 years ago
Those with _______________ symptoms are likely to experience delusions and to be diagnosed with ______________ schizophrenia. th
iris [78.8K]
1.)either Bipolar or Hallucinations
2.)psychotic (its what i am)
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Using complete sentences, explain the difference between an indirect democracy and a direct democracy.
    9·2 answers
  • Where is Mesopotamia and why is it ideal for the beginnings of civilization?
    15·1 answer
  • How can discussions, projects, campaigns and events support victims of human rights violations
    13·1 answer
  • What events lead to 16th amendment?
    12·1 answer
  • What was key to the Supreme Court's argument in the verdict of the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case?
    11·2 answers
  • The powers of the president are not limited to those granted in the Constitution. The Constitution grants few specific powers to
    7·1 answer
  • Provide definition, explanation and examples for functionalist theory​
    6·1 answer
  • Can you guys help me
    12·2 answers
  • To what extent are political disputes and conflicts in the Middle East rooted in sectarian differences, and to what extent does
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the loss at Bull Run/Manassas so dangerous to the north?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!