Answer:
The early western railroads ran east to west rather than north to south and the reason mainly was due to faster traveling east and west to move goods from coast to coast.
Explanation:
Main reasons behind the early western railroads running east and west rather than north and south were as follows:
- Transcontinental roads were faster to travel and move goods from east and west from coast to coast.
- There was rise of the industries in the west that led to expansion of the railroads in order to link industries of the west to the markets of the east.
I’m pretty sure it’s C. Milk, beef, eggs, and corn
Scientists believe that plate tectonics is an example of an internal force that changes the earth's crust. There are about seven or eight plates that make up the Lithosphere of our earth. The Lithosphere is the hard outer crust of our planet earth and this is the one that is broken up into a number of tectonic plates. <span />
According to fossil studies episodic
speciation is what mass extinction leads to. I think this is the best choice
because mass extinction is a chain of events were a huge portion of species are killed. This process generates new species every time it occurs.
The right answer is D. Episodic
Speciation
<span>
I hope it helps, Regards.</span>
Answer:
The economic effects were more significant than the social effects.
Explanation:
The social effects included the flooding of over 600 houses and the evacuation of 16 farms. Villages, such as Borrowbridge, were cut off, and power supplies, roads, and railways were also affected. The Bristol to Taunton line was closed at Bridgwater for instance. The environmental impacts were even worse though; an enormous volume of debris dumped by the floodwaters had to be cleaned up and stagnant waters had to be re-oxygenated before being pumped back into rivers. However, I think the worse impact of all was the contamination of all flooded areas by oil, agricultural chemicals, livestock effluent, and human sewage. I think that this is the worst impact because of its potential for causing harm to humans and other animals.
In conclusion, I think that the socio-economic and environmental effects of this flood were both important but that the environmental effect was more important, because of the potential to cause harm.