Answer:
Difference is given as under
Explanation:
- Mountain belts or mountain ranges are a line of hills connected by high ground. Usually an orogeny most of them are a result of plate tectonic effects and maybe young may be old depending upon their characteristic composition. Like the Himalayas is a young fold mountain formed in the tertiary system of rocks.
- Usually, the mountain is separated from highlands, valleys, and passes. Usually, they tend to regulate the climate affecting snow and rainfall patterns. As compared to the stable interiors upon concerning their age are mostly young as they are continuously on the move and their formation is impacted by erosion and continuous wear and tear of geomaterials.
- Concerning the height, the continents are lower as compared to the high elevated landmasses. Though the continents have large landmass and landscape is composed of various elements as mountain belts are smaller as composed to chains connecting the continents at the edges and borders.
- Only continental mountain belts like the arctic and antarctic circle have a large scale of mountain chains and ranges on earth that are since millions and billions of years ago the formation of super landmasses.
Answer:
The shallow water and proximity of the sides of the channel effects the ship navigating through the restricted waters. ... This decreases the upward pressure on the hull, making the ship sink deeper in the water than normal and slowing the vessel.
The scientific method is a method of investigation involving experimentation and observation to acquire new knowledge, solve problems, and answer questions. The key steps in the scientific method include the following: Step 1: Make observations. Step 2: Formulate a hypothesis.
hOpe it helps
thanks xoxo
Answer:
Explanation:
Mankind seems to learn very little from anything -- good or bad. There are many things you could say about Natural Gas or Oil, but one thing that neither one could do is create another Chernobyl.
People are saying that the cleanest and most efficient way to go would be to use Nuclear Power Plants. I admit that Gas and oil create their own set of environmental problems, but nothing as far reaching as something lasting 35 years as Chernobyl has done
Scientists are bewildered by Chernobyl heating up again. They cannot explain why let alone what can be done. Each of the alternate energy choices have their problems and have their ill effects on the environment.
Polaris directly over head.
Thats the only thing I can think of if you have options I could answer better.
