1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kaheart [24]
4 years ago
11

What did Abraham Lincoln gain from the Lincoln-Douglas debates in spite of losing the 1858 U.S. Senate election to Stephen A. Do

uglas?
History
2 answers:
son4ous [18]4 years ago
7 0

In spite of losing the 1858 U.S. Senate election to Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln gained from the debates as they put him on the national map as a major political contender. This was critical as it helped him later in his campaign to be president

konstantin123 [22]4 years ago
4 0

Lincoln’s energetic campaign had made him a national figure well positioned to become the Republican presidential candidate in 1860. Lincoln-Douglas debates took place, from August 21 to October 15, 1858. They attracted thousands of spectators and were read in the newspapers by many more. The debates transformed an Illinois contest for a Senate seat into a battle for the very future of the Republic.  It changed the dynamics of the politics with the Republicans, having become the dominant force in northern politics by combining alienated Democrats, former Whigs, and members of the nativist American Party (“Know-Nothings”).

You might be interested in
Did the Federalists or Anti- Federalists have more influence on the "Bill of Rights?"
Tatiana [17]

The Anti-Federalists had more influence on the Bill of Rights, as they were the ones who wanted it in the first place. The Federalists thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while the Anti-Federalists pushed for it.

The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, and numerous other important matters. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, as they associated having a strong government with British tyranny. They thought that if the government was powerful, they may abuse the citizens. The Federalists on the other hand wanted a stronger government. They believed that having a strong government meant having a strong country, and they thought the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good. When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 occurred, the Articles of Confederation was only meant to be changed. It ended up getting thrown out all together and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists disagreed with this and demanded to have a Bill of Rights, which would protect the citizen's rights. The Federalists thought this wasn't needed, as the states had the powers that the federal government did not. The Anti-Federalists insisted though and believed it was important that they had a proper document protecting their rights.

The Anti-Federalists had more influence while creating the Bill of Rights because they were the ones who pushed for it in the first place. They thought having a document to protect the rights of the citizens was needed, while the Federalists thought it was essentially useless as the states already had all of the powers that the federal government did not hold.

5 0
3 years ago
During the first Selma voting rights march on March 7, 1965,
monitta

The correct answer is (B). marchers were attacked by police as they crossed a bridge.

The Selma march was led by John Lewis and other activists aiming to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge over the Alabama River en route to Montgomery. But just short of the bridge, they found their way blocked by the local police who ordered them to turn around and go back. When the protesters refused, the officers shot tear gas and waded into the crowd, beating the nonviolent protesters with billy clubs.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
C.T.Q. What caused Congress to pass the Lend-Lease Act in 1941 to replace the Cash and Carry Plan from 1930?
kifflom [539]

Answer:

Passed on March 11, 1941, this act set up a system that would allow the United States to lend or lease war supplies to any nation deemed "vital to the defense of the United States."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Many state constitutions expanded suffrage, which is the right to _____
erica [24]
It gave women the right to vote
5 0
3 years ago
What happens when different religions come together?
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

good question

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Roosevelt decided to invade morocco and algeria because ____________________ and also __________________. Generals ___________ a
    11·1 answer
  • World war 1 alliance that included great britain france and russia
    12·1 answer
  • Translate the first amendment
    11·1 answer
  • The greatest earthquake ever recorded was in what South American country?
    12·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the Boston tea party?
    9·1 answer
  • Congress supported construction of the transcontinental railroad by
    15·2 answers
  • How does bias affect the work of historians
    11·1 answer
  • Describe four factors that helped bring about the industrial revolution to england.
    14·1 answer
  • If someone can trace a family connection back to West Africa, it is most likely that that person's ancestors came from which civ
    6·1 answer
  • What did the Militia Act of 1862 allow<br> President Lincoln to do?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!