1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firdavs [7]
3 years ago
5

How was a slave more profitable than an indentured servant? Indentured servants were under a paid contract. Slaves were sold for

more than indentured servants were sold for. Slaves were a permanent labor while indentured servants were only for a few years. Indentured servants could run away and blend into society.
History
1 answer:
ohaa [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Slaves were a permanent labor while indentured servants were only for a few years.

Explanation:

Slaves trade was trade that involves buying of African's from different parts of Africa and were later sold buy there slaves masters to their buyers in Europe and American while indentured servant are merely contract workers who can either be whites or blacks doing labor works. They are not stigmatize on racial discrimination or any form.

However, slaves trade was more profitable because it was a big business where African's are sold in exchange for money or unlike indentured servant who are mainly workers that are paid for the labor they carry out. A slave effort or labor can never be paid for  because he or she is seen as the property of the master.

You might be interested in
Briefly describe the standard social science approach to examining racial inequality
maksim [4K]
It has a racial inequalities that change over time
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
prohojiy [21]

The answer would be:

C. The Republican platform in 1845 was anti-slavery and the Democratic platform was pro-slavery.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The decision to drop the atomic bomb was intended to accomplish which goal(s)?
ollegr [7]

Answer:

c. The decision to drop the atomic bomb was to end WW II quickly

Explanation:

The decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was in order to end the World War II quickly and efficiently. By using the atomic bomb, the United States wanted to destroy Japan as soon as possible, as the fighting on land that was going on, even though it was successful, still it was slow and there were lot of casualties on the side of the United States and their allies. By eliminating Japan as a threat, the US forces would have been able to move to Europe and together with the Allies to finish off Germany, and so it was.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I’ll give the first to answer brainliest.
Gemiola [76]
I can’t read your handwriting bro
4 0
3 years ago
What is the term for a short statement about history that has not yet been
Damm [24]

Answer:

B.) Claim

Explanation:

Can't really explain it but it is correct.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Natural selection
    8·1 answer
  • What does Emma Goldman think people should spend the money on
    8·1 answer
  • What were the social concerns of the 1970s?
    5·1 answer
  • A commonality among the governments of the Kingdoms of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai is that they all  ___. 
    9·2 answers
  • Why did the state of texas do little to help its citizens during the great depression
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following would not have been an early goal of the Knights of
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a Native American group that lived on the west coast of North America?
    6·1 answer
  • What kinds of aggressive steps did Hitler take in the 1930s? How did European leaders respond? Why?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statements about the reign of louis 14 are true
    13·1 answer
  • The Great Depression began when the US Stock Market crashed in 1929. The effect of the crash was felt around the world but affec
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!