The Quakers lived in harmony and peace, as their religion permitted and demanded; therefore, they had no problems with neighboring Indian tribes; however, this peace was threatened in 1757, when the Delaware and Shawnee natives joined the French, during the Franco-Indian War, and the Pennsylvania government declared war on the two Indian tribes. From that moment on, the Quakers renounced the Pennsylvania Council to keep themselves out of this war, for their pacifist way of seeing life prevented them from going to war with the Indian tribes.
Opposition increased over time because american citizens had kept seeing the results of the war. For example, like increased funding, many deaths, and lost a lot of battles. As the war continued and the US was not progressing any in defeating North Vietnamese forces, Americans began to view the fighting as pointless due to all the consequences. I believe it was justified, because the outcomes could have been avoided if peace with Vietnam was settled earlier or if the US didn't even get involved.
I believe the answer is: They worried about having to take part in future wars.
At that time, the united states senates prefer to take the position as a neutral force that want to avoid any intervention toward other countries' problems. This stand is taken away the moment the Japanese army decided to initiate an attack to the pearl harbour.
Answer:
During a two-year period known as the Reign of Terror, the episodes of anti-clericalism grew more violent than any in modern European history. The new revolutionary authorities suppressed the Church, abolished the Catholic monarchy, nationalized Church property, exiled 30,000 priests, and killed hundreds more.
Explanation:
