What is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd?a. Implicit themesb. Stage directions c. A resolution to the conflictd. Internal conflict
<u>Answer:</u>
A resolution to the conflict is not typically present in works of the theater of the absurd.
c. A resolution to the conflict
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Theater of the Absurd assaults the agreeable convictions of strict or political conventionality. A type of dramatization that accentuates the foolishness of human presence by utilizing incoherent, monotonous, and unimportant exchange, purposeless and confounding circumstances, and plots that need practical or intelligent improvement.
Theater of the Absurd, emotional works of certain European and American producers of the 1950s and mid '60s who concurred with the Existentialist savant Albert Camus' appraisal, in his article "The Myth of Sisyphus" (1942), that the human circumstance is basically preposterous, without reason. So a goals to the contention isn't commonly present in works of the venue of the ludicrous.
Let's start with an obvious one. He certainly is not a coward. He was willing to take on a dog that was ferocious; in contrast, Heathcliff makes the comment that the "cowardly children also crept forward..." That quoted phrase is somewhere near the very end.
Your first example of yellow underlining is a wonderful example. Heathcliff is quite common and he would use common English. He characterizes Cathy as being gentile and not given to saying anything contrary to her upbringing.
I would note that Heathcliff followed grumbling execrations and vengeance. [an execration is a threat denouncement or curse. Again Heathcliff is showing his common upbringing. Cathy would choke before she would utter such things. This one is kind of iffy. You could omit it. It is by inference something that shows that Heathcliff is different].
Your second underlined statement is correct. It characterizes Heathcliff as a robber and a thief and part of a lowlife gang. You could go on. Robert does not hesitate to make his feelings known and adds to what you underlined.
Your third underlined statement is correct as well. I have added two but your examples are fine.
Who marks this? Make an appeal if you get it wrong. Interpreting literature is that way. This is not exactly a factual question and the only way to answer it is to compare Heathcliff to someone else. I chose Robert and Cathy. Write your instructor and provide some of the evidence you have provided here.
Answer:
jest read the question then find the suitable answer like for ex:
Explanation:
i am ??? what am i a girl
B. it is b. b is the answer
Answer:
The message about using a safety belt is not clearly presented until the end.
Explanation:
I took the quiz.
