Answer: Boston Tea Party is that the uprising wasn't a dissent against another expense climb on tea. Despite the fact that charges fed pilgrim outrage, the Tea Act itself didn't raise the cost of tea in the settlements by one red penny (or pushing, figuratively speaking).
The disarray is incompletely timing and somewhat semantics. Boston's Sons of Liberty were completely reacting to the British Parliament's entry of the Tea Act of 1773 when they arranged the Boston Tea Party. What's more, with a name like the Tea Act, it's reasonable for feel that the law was tied in with raising duties on tea.
