Research are likely to suggest that competitive encounters are likely to be more hard working while the collaborative encounters are the ones who will likely give their time to cooperate. It is because competitive encounters are usually competitive in a way of reaching their tasks or goals while the collaborative encounters are likely to just cooperate because of their knowledge with the given task.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
i said because you need to know your location so can find more of what your searching for
Helpppp me nowww I need this answer ASAP
The answer is cell membrane.
Answer:
The given question is incomplete; options are missing.
The missing options are:
A. valid because this conclusion is believable.
B. valid because this is indeed a valid syllogism and the logic is apparent.
C. invalid because this syllogism does not involve a pragmatic reasoning schema.
D. invalid because of the influence of the atmosphere effect.
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a rhetorical device used to draw a conclusion about certain arguments(premise). It is a form of logical reasoning.
A syllogism can be divided into three parts:
- Minor premise
- Major Premise
- Conclusion
In the given case, the major premise is <em>"some tired people are irritable" </em>because it is stating a fact;<em> "all of the students are tired"</em> is a minor premise that is specifying a statement, and <em>"some of the students are irritable"</em> is a conclusion drawn from the major and minor premise.
This syllogism will be considered valid because the conclusion is believable.
