1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andru [333]
3 years ago
10

How does migration and culture relates? Explain in complete sentences. 40 points answe quiq under 4 minuets

History
1 answer:
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago
8 0
Migration and culture relate because while human society migrates culture moves with it. We spread our culture through different countries as we move from one place to another. For example, as Italian people made pizza and then pizza was introduced to the rest of the world by migration. By one or maybe many people moving and taking their culture with them and bringing their cultural values, ideas, food to a new place, this is how migration and culture relate to one another.
You might be interested in
PLZ HELP ASAP!!! I WILL GIVE BRIAINLIEST!!!!
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

They were angry at the king for requesting a new tax on land.

Explanation:

Its right

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When germany began ww2 in 1939 a secret agreement with the ussr allowed soviet troops to?
Anna35 [415]
On August 23, 1939–shortly before World War II (1939-45) broke out in Europe–enemies Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union surprised the world by signing the German-Soviet Nonaggression Pact, in which the two countries agreed to take no military action against each other for the next 10 years.
4 0
3 years ago
The Intolerable Acts were aimed at punishing Boston for its infamous Tea Party.<br> -True<br> -False
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
That is TRUE, the Intoerable Acts punished the colonials in Boston for undermining British Authority


4 0
3 years ago
Why were the British able to conquer New France in the 7 years wars
Orlov [11]

The British was able to win the Seven Years wars through;

• Proper leadership through William Pitt who invested heavily in the war by increasing his control on North America. Louis XV of France was more occupied with his wife and court proceedings that diverted his attention on the colonies.

• Application of a different global strategy-William Pitt invested more money and resources in the conflict in the colonies.

• There was collaboration with authorities-Local authorities were granted control over supplies and recruitment of soldiers.

• British were having a better navy and controlled most of the harbors.

• The British had large numbers of soldiers and better resources.  


8 0
3 years ago
Where was persian and who were the kings of persia?
tangare [24]

Persia, was an ancient kingdom within Iran.

<span>Some of the kings of Persia include: </span>

<span>Cyrus the Great
Darius I
Xerxes I
Cambyses II
Darius III</span>

<span>Hope this helps. :)
</span>

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The SALT Il treaty was signed by President<br> A.) Reagan <br> B.) Carter<br> C.) Ford
    10·2 answers
  • If u are smart at history plz help me. thx
    15·2 answers
  • Why the Alexander the great always ..
    7·1 answer
  • What did the Compromise of 1850 say about slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes why the Roman Empire faced food shortages?
    9·2 answers
  • The North Koreans were much better prepared for the korean war than the South. Is this true
    12·2 answers
  • What did the United States gain from the crisis?what did it lose?
    11·1 answer
  • Which leader defended the Inca from the Chanca and began expanding the empire?
    14·2 answers
  • Please help<br> best answer = brainlist
    7·1 answer
  • Which event was the final straw for the Articles of Confederation, which showed that it was too weak?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!