Answer:
According to Gies, the motivation was simply the fact that she wanted to help and she would have felt regret, if she let innocent people die.
Explanation:
Till the end of her life, Gies, never considered herself a hero. She explained that it was human nature to help someone and clearly stated, that by calling her actions 'brave' or 'heroic' would put on her on a pedestal, and demotivate other people to act out kindly when needed.
Gies was Dutch and had worked with Jewish people before. She felt empathy and always thought her actions were natural, human and not at all special.
The term for the African American ladies memorial association that arranged the mourning for union soldiers buried in charleston is, “Patriotic Association”.
<h3>Who are African Americans?</h3>
African Americans are the people who are born in America but they have their lineage from Africa. The Africans came to America as slaves to the colonial masters. They started living here in the same conditions and established their families in America itself.
The conditions of the blacks and other colored people in America were miserable for a long time, they were considered American citizens neither by the white people nor by the government.
So, the phrase "Patriotic Association" refers to the African American ladies memorial association that organized the services for the union troops interred in Charleston.
Learn more about African Americans here:
brainly.com/question/16213124
#SPJ1
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Your answer is D because It is the right of states to veto federal law he did that to happen.
Hope this helps u:)
Pls mark brainlist
<span>Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) was a landmark constitutional law case of the US Supreme Court decided in 1896. It upheld state racial segregation laws for public facilities under the doctrine of "separate but equal".</span>
Answer:
<u>Positive effects</u> - Great Britain brought its political and industrialist points of view. In this way,<u>railroads were built, bridges and cities were modernized In a nutshell, India saw an increased development (especially in industrialization).</u> The same happens with the administration, <em><u>and the conflict between the local leaders became less common.</u></em>
<em><u></u></em>
<u>Negative effects -</u> <u>we can't forget that India was under control of an imperialist country, and because of that, indian villages were not self control, and everything was determined by the British government. </u>
Explanation:
