The answer is <span>Empire of Japan: minimum 1743 years to date</span>
A
The Mongols were very tolerant towards other religions and the time saw many conversions in religion.
Answer:
Percy Bysshe Shelley's view is more favorable to me.
Explanation:
Percy Bysshe Shelley was more faithful to the Prometheus myth in his work "Prometheus Unbound." This is because in "Prometheus Unbound" we are more exposed to the idea that knowledge generates freedom, but it can prevent the freedom of those who generated it, which is more faithful to the myth of Prometheus than the vision that Mary Shelley presents in Frankenstein , although it also addresses the issues of freedom and knowledge, as it focuses more on the ability to generate human life.
Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option O.
All of the above
Explanation: There were a series of wars between the colonial force and the native Americans which were mainly Indians.Even after the independence of the America from British there was a war between Indians and whites. After, independence the federal government took some policy Indians which were not pleasant for them, which led a bloody war between the Indians and white troops.
The duration of the war was long. But the in the long run the Indians were defeated. There were some reasons for the defeat of Indians. The buffalo soldiers were an important part of the war. They were the strength of the Indians warriors. But the decrease of their number became a reason of their defeat.
On the other hand, the white soldiers had advanced military technology like as guns, canons etc. But Indians did not have enough modern weapon to fight against the white soldiers.
Moreover, the number of Indians were less than white Americans. As a result they were outnumbered.
Therefore, all these factors led the defeat of Plains Indians.
Answer:
Explanation:
Comments
- Hitler tried it. How far did he get? Hitler never got to Moscow let alone further inland. Russia offers the following problems.
- It has a vast area to conquer.
- It has a good working industrial base. During WWII, Russia had that Industrial Base up and running. The problem from their point of view was that America's was better. I don't think that that's true now.
- Russia has an adequate army, air force and navy. Hitler relied on Blitzkrieg (which he thought he could conquer Russia quickly. It didn't turn out that way). which simply would not work on the Russian terrain. Many of Hitler's soldiers froze to death because he could not supply them with winter clothing. It would be that much harder now.
Answer: don't try it. It is better to wage economic war, but that seems like a poor idea to me. Russia's currency is in pretty good shape. Can you say the same about the American dollar?
