Answer:
Interest paid each year = 5% of 1000 = $50
$1000 is to be paid at the end of 10 years.So payment each year = pmt(rate,nper,pv,fv) where rate = 0.04,nper=10 and fv =1000.
Payment into the fund =pmt(0.04,10,0,1000) = $83.29 each year
Value of the sinking fund at the end of the 4th year =pv(rate,nper.pmt) =pv(0.04,4,83.29) = 302.34
Interest earned by sinking fund in year 5 = 0.04*302.34 = 12.09
Interest on loan in 5th year = $50
So difference between the interest payment on the loan and the interest earned by the sinking fund in the fifth year. = 50-12.09 = 37.91 = $38 (to nearest whole number)
I guess the correct answer is the quantity supplied to decrease.
The market demand for singing dolls is initially made up of 50 buyers. Suppose there is a decrease in the number of buyers by 10. Holding everything else constant, one would expect the quantity supplied to decrease.
This scenario is an example of attempted "phishing"
Your answer is phishing
D. The farmer saves money by not having to use any fertilizer
Answer:
Implicit Imputed opportunity cost of time sacrifised while airport drop .
Explanation:
My friend asking me to drop at airport, & paying costs : gas used while driving, parking cost of car - has excluded certain price giving aspects.
He has included all the Explicitly quantified costs , whose payment is made to third person - like fuel & parking.
However, he has not included the implicit cost in terms of opportunity cost i.e other things sacrifised while going to drop him. Such costs payment is although not directly made to third person, but they still reflect a 'cost' as they reflect a gain sacrifised meanwhile.
In this case, it includes time sacrifised while going to drop friend at airport. That time could be used at work, which could have monetary benefits. So, this cost is eliminated to be evaluated by my friend.