1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serhud [2]
3 years ago
10

which nations conducted the nuremberg trials in the years following world war ii to punish nazi war criminals? a) the soviet uni

on and great britain b) the united states, japan, great britain, and italy c) the united states, the soviet union, great britain, and italy d) the united states, the soviet union, great britain, and france eliminate
History
1 answer:
Nana76 [90]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is D) Great Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and France.

<em>The nations that conducted the Nuremberg Trails in the years following World War II were  Great Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and France.</em>

The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trails in the city of Nuremberg, Germany. They had the purpose of judging war Nazi members for crimes of war. The trials were 13 in total and were carried away from 1945 to 1949. The countries that participated in the Nuremberg Trials were Great Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and France.

You might be interested in
During a five year period under the Reagan administration, how much was spent on defense?
vladimir1956 [14]
C. 1.5 trillion was spent on defense
8 0
3 years ago
The sixth and eighth amendments reflect the purpose of the Bill of Rights to
LuckyWell [14K]
The correct answer is A) protect the rights of citizens.

The 6th amendment guarantees American citizens the right to a fair and speedy public trial. Along with this, the 6th amendment protects the citizens right by having a "fair and impartial" jury present to hear their case.

The 8th amendment protects citizens accused of a crime from having an excessive bail. The amount of money needed to bail the person out of jail must fit the crime they are accused of.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which option evaluates how the Bill of Rights addressed Anti-Federalist concerns about establishing a strong central government?
jeka94
The Anti-federalists wanted the Bill of Rights included as a safeguard to individual liberty. So, the last option.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the need for a declaration of independence
Juli2301 [7.4K]
To set a base collection of laws
5 0
3 years ago
Place the following elements of a criminal case in sequential order
QveST [7]

Answer:

1. Arrest: This is the process of restraining or apprehending a person (usually a suspect) for an investigation.

2. Indictment: After an arrest, a formal charge is drafted stating the alleged offence that the arrested suspect has committed. It is the charge or the alleged offence that is regarded as an indictment.

3. Arraignment and plea: This refers to the procedure where the accused person/defendant is brought before the court and the charge is read to him in the language that he understands, after which he takes his plea (whether guilty or not guilty).

4. Appearance before a judge: After arraignment and taking of plea the accused person/defendant is then brought before a judge, usually represented by a legal practitioner.

5. Trial: This is the process or stage of criminal procedure where the case of the parties are argued before the court, witnesses are called, and evidence is presented before the court.

6. Verdict and Sentencing: After due evaluation of the case presented before the court and the evidence tendered, the court will make its findings and pronounce its verdict or judgment on the matter  based on its findings on a considered weighting of credible evidence. After which, If the accused person/defendant is found guilty, the the court will sentence the accused person by imposing the punishment prescribed by law on such person.

7.  Appeal: This is the process whereby a person who is unsatisfied with the verdict or judgment of the court, brings an application before an appellate court to have the earlier judgment set aside or varied.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In “The Negro Speaks of Rivers,” how does Hughes use images of rivers, dark and light, to communicate the experience of his race
    5·1 answer
  • How was Holland, Michigan founded?
    11·2 answers
  • According to the declaration of independence the main purpose of government is to
    7·1 answer
  • How was the young lad punished for being late or falling behind at work
    15·1 answer
  • What was the first representive assembly in the english colony in 1619
    12·2 answers
  • Hurrry!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • What was the name of the phase in the French Revolution when the guillotine was frequently used?
    12·2 answers
  • Where can you usually find Cupid?
    5·1 answer
  • : at least 30 years old, live in the state for seven years prior<br> to the election (Florida)
    13·1 answer
  • The cotton gin was introduced in 1793. What was the effect of this invention in the US?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!