Since we already have 3^7 you should know that 3 times 3 is 9. Here is how I would simplify it.
3^7 times 3^4 times 3^3
You should add all the exponents and get
3^14
27 is basically 3 times 3 times 3 which is why I chose to put 27 that way
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Recall that for a quadratic equation of the form:
The number of solutions it has can be determined using its discriminant:

Where:
- If the discriminant is positive, we have two real solutions.
- If the discriminant is negative, we have no real solutions.
- And if the discriminant is zero, we have exactly one solution.
We have the equation:

Thus, <em>a</em> = 2, <em>b</em> = 5, and <em>c</em> = -<em>k</em>.
In order for the equation to have exactly one distinct solution, the discriminant must equal zero. Hence:

Substitute:

Solve for <em>k</em>. Simplify:

Solve:

Thus, our answer is indeed A.
Answer: 3(x+2)
Let me know when you need help
I'll help get your answer!
To do this, find the slope, y-intercept, and your goal.
Your goal is 500.
Your slope is 6.25 per orange.
Your y-intercept is 0 (you don't start out with anything.)
So, the inequality is

.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim to be tested is:
The mean respiration rate (in breaths per minute) of students in a large statistics class is less than 32.
To test this claim the hypothesis can be defined as follows:
<em>H₀</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> = 32.
<em>Hₐ</em>: The mean respiration rate of students is less than 32, i.e. <em>μ</em> < 32.
The sample mean respiration rate of students is 31.3.
According to the claim the sample mean is less than 32.
The sample mean value is not unusual if the claim is true, and the sample mean value is also not unusual if the claim is false.
Thus, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.