Yes I think they can, if they are trying to agree on moral matters in "Public Policy" I don't see why religion would have to play a part in the discussion
Making art available to everyone is a component of the Harlem Renaissance. Artists used a wide range of modalities to express themselves.
<h3>What was the essence of the Harlem Renaissance?</h3>
The most significant period in African American literary history was the Harlem Renaissance, which lasted roughly from 1918 to 1937. Theatrical, visual, and musical arts were all a part of the movement. The intimate ties the Harlem Renaissance had to civil rights and reform movements set it apart from other literary and cultural groups.
<h3>What is the Harlem Renaissance, exactly?</h3>
For African Americans, the Harlem Renaissance was a time of great artistic, literary, and musical achievement. It paved the way for the civil rights movement by giving these artists pride in and influence over how the Black experience was portrayed in American culture.
Learn more about Harlem Renaissance: brainly.com/question/9195022
#SPJ4
Long-term v. short-term presidency: Some wanted lifelong terms down to two year terms--there were concerns of chaotic changes not allowing for stability and the states' rights side (Anti-Federalists) wanted the ability to change power often.
There were also discussions regarding qualifications and powers of the president. Most of the disagreements were decided by compromise leading to the government that is created out of the Constitutional Convention.
Answer:
The separation of powers is important because it provides a vital system of ‘checks and balances’: Firstly, it ensures that the different branches control each other. This is intended to make them accountable to each other – these are the ‘checks’. Secondly, it divides power between the different branches of government. This balance aims to ensure that no individual or group of people in government is ‘all powerful’.
