Hi. Did you forget to say that this question is about the speech "The Duties of American Citizenship"
Answer and Explanation:
How does Roosevelt’s speech create a sense of obligation for men to participate in civics? Roosevelt shows that men who do not receive a civil education and adopt the concepts of that education for their lives and actions, cannot find solutions either for their domestic life, nor for their nation, becoming the problem and not showing useful for your country.
How does his use of rhetoric advance his purpose? He creates the rhetoric of this discourse within ethical and logical appeals that show that he is a citizen goes beyond the act of voting. A citizen, in addition to knowing how to vote, knows how to charge and knows how to work for the future of the country.
How does he structure his speech? Roosevelt structures the article by pointing out simpler arguments that focus on the domestic and community environment at the beginning of the article. However, as the atigo progresses, we can see that Roosevelt exposes more and more profound and complex arguments focused on politics, economics and society at the national level, but specific.
How does he introduce his ideas? He presents his ideas in a direct but punctual way for the topic he is presenting, that is, he establishes the ideas in a simple way, but focusing directly on the civic role of men and the results that this role proposes.
How does he develop them? It develops through examples and situations that its audience can understand based on ordinary daily life, or on experiences that are identifiable by anyone at any age or social class.
How does he end his speech? he ends the speech by reinforcing the importance that men have in assuming their national responsibilities and working directly to promote the benefit of the country, without victimizing and creating unrealistic ideals, but proposing real changes and working on their behalf.
How does this structure serve his purpose? This structure is very persuasive and encourages the creation of thoughts about how a country does not win with indivialist ideals and with passive and accommodated people.
