Answer:
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced.
Explanation:
if you were to remove the easily swayed audience and replace it with a more objective audience,Mark Antony's speech would not still stand up as a convincing work of rhetoric.
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced. So I feel if the crowd were actually normal people the story could be different they wouldn’t be definitely so .
Out of the choices given, the sentence from a hypothetical novel suggests a third person restricted omniscience. The correct answer is C.
It’s D. Members of the House of Representatives
Idk but you should put the information in the section that compares or gives their similarities for both male and female tusks. Hope I helped!
English most likely, but sometimes they surprise you with Japanese.
