Why didn’t cotton diplomacy work?

1 answer:

4 0

The cotton diplomacy was a huge mistake by the South. The cotton was one of the most important products in the South, and it was also a product on which the British and the French heavily relied on. The Confederacy tried to force the British and the French to ally with them in the Civil War by putting an embargo on the cotton. This didn't had any effect as wanted though, but it backfired. The British and the French found new sources for getting cotton, while the South turned out to put an embargo on itself, as it blocked its own product which badly affected its economy too.

You might be interested in

What was the iron curtain? Why were western leaders so concerned about it?

Elina [12.6K]

The iron curtain refers to the line that separated the Soviet satellite states of eastern Europe from western Europe. The term "iron curtain" was chosen to describe the degree of separation that existed between Communist and non-Communist states in Europe and to describe the repression and force by the USSR in the establishment of its sphere of influence. I think that western leaders were so concerned about the Iron Curtain because it represented the Soviet Union's continued desire to expand, the threat of war with the Soviet Union, and the overall threat of Communism.

7 0

3 years ago

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.

8 0

4 years ago

If one nation becomes more efficient than another nation at producing a specific product, the more efficient nation is said to h

slamgirl [31]

If one nation becomes more efficient than another nation at producing a specific product, the more efficient nation is said to have a comparative advantage. This economic idea was first developed by David Ricardo.

7 0

4 years ago

Please help it is question 3

ololo11 [35]

Answer:

can not read it to blurry

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which organization was formed to protect Western European democracies in the Cold War?

navik [9.2K]

Answer:

NATO

Explanation:

NATO is an alliance of 28 countries bordering the North Atlantic Ocean. It includes the United States, most European Union members, Canada, and Turkey. NATO is an acronym for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers