In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis.
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the members’ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. “to the north”) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. “to the left”).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the Whorf–Sapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.
<span>D. England had large deposits of iron.
</span>The Industrial Revolution began in Britain<span> for a number of different reasons. </span>Britain<span> had access to a number of natural resources, such as iron and coal. The agricultural sector of the British economy had been steadily growing during the 18th century. Agricultural stability allowed the British population to increase.</span>
Answer: ok
Explanation: I will not be like Bill
Answer:
Option A
Explanation
I don't agree with option A, there can't be an agreement to how and when market will fail, market can be predictable or dictated , we can't determine what will happen the market today's , the prices ranges and defers ,the investments are different so where will the agreement of how the market will fail established and between which parties what are the facts that will make this happens discussed . so option A is inaccurate as market down fail doesn't exisit based on the agreement.