Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Put the values of x to the equations of the functions:
1. f(9) → x = 9; f(x) = -3x + 10
f(9) = -3(9) + 10 = -27 + 10 = -17
2. f(-2) → x = -2; f(x) = 4x - 1
f(-2) = 4(-2) - 1 = -8 - 1 = -9
3. f(-5) → x = -5; f(x) = -2x + 8
f(-5) = -2(-5) + 8 = 10 + 8 = 18
11, because 11 times 1 is 11 and 11 times 4 is 44.
9,899 = 206x
He divided by 206
He got 48.053 and rounded up to 49
My using the equation, we can see that he is correct.
subtract 172000 and 8000 then divide by 2 maybe
