Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
Answer:Cuando la salud de Felipe empezó a fallar, trabajó desde sus dependencias en el Palacio-Monasterio-Panteón de El Escorial, que construyó con Juan Batista de Toledo y que fue otra expresión de los compromisos de Felipe de proteger a los católicos contra la creciente influencia del protestantismo en toda Europa.
Explanation:Espero que esto ayude
Answer:
have both a free market and communist government system
Explanation:
Mark as brainliest :)
Answer: Wealthy civilizations conquered neighboring areas.
Explanation:
Land has always been a valuable resource and in the ancient world was a sign of how much power a nation possessed.
With the wealth accumulated by the wealthier civilizations, they were better able to not only raise armies but to equip them as well.
They would then use these armies to conquer neighbouring areas to increase their influence and area of control and to show how powerful they were.
The archduke was assassinated in the city of Sarajevo
