Answer and explanation:
Althea is covered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (<em>EEOC</em>). The EEOC is an agency of the federal government of the United States that enforces federal laws regarding discrimination of <em>race, sex, age, religion, ethnicity, national origin or impairment</em>. Althea was fired with the excuse that it is not "appropriate" for an African American deejay to play music on a white Christian music station. This is reason enough to sue the radio station for discrimination.
Answer:
a) Ending adjusted basis and at-risk amount $ 0
(b)The current passive loss is $12,000. Because $7,500 of the loss is used to reduce
the at-risk amount to $0, $4,500 is suspended under the at-risk rules ($12,000 − $7,500 = $4,500).
(c) The $7,500 loss that is not limited by the at-risk rules is subject to the passive loss
rules. Because the taxpayer has not generated any passive income during the year, this $7,500 current-year passive loss is suspended. Therefore, the total suspended passive loss carried forward to subsequent years totals $9,000 ($7,500 current-year suspended loss + $1,500 prior year suspended loss).
Explanation:
Whats the answer options you get
Answer:
a. Suppose that if you receive the stock bonus, you are free to trade it. Which form of the bonus should you choose? What is its value?
I would choose the stock bonus because the current market price = 200 x $64 = $12,800 which is much higher than $4,600 (cash bonus)
b. Suppose that if you receive the stock bonus, you are required to hold it for at least one year. What can you say about the value of the stock bonus now? What will your decision depend on?
Even if you are required to hold the stock for one year, the price difference with the cash bonus is too great = ($12,800 - $4,600) / $4,600 = 178% higher. Since you are employed by the company, you should know if the company is doing well or not, and the probable future stock price.
Only if something catastrophic happened to the company would make the cash bonus more attractive.
Answer:
a). The statement on the income tax form about the deduction for children and other dependents was simply unreadable.
b). The type of career that many graduates are hoping to pursue pay high salaries and provide long vacations.
c). Apparently, the use of robots in factories has been responsible for a great deal of worker dissatisfaction.
d). The problems associated with government deregulation have been responsible for the economic plight of several major airlines in recent years.
e). The impact of computers on our lives is comparable to the impact of the industrial revolution.
f). The amount of money and time I spend on computer games <u>is</u> more than I can afford.
Explanation:
Subject-verb agreement is described as the grammatical rule according to which the subject, as well as, the verb must agree with one another in number. As per the rules, if the subject(noun or noun phrase) is singular, it will take a singular verb while if the subject is plural(noun or noun phrase), it will carry a plural verb.
According to this rule, <u>the first and third sentence fails to follow this agreement</u>. The first sentence inadequately carries a plural verb 'were' with the singular noun ('The statement') and similarly, the third sentence wrongly employs plural verb 'have' with the singular noun 'the use.' The other sentences are grammatically appropriate as the verbs and noun phrases agree in number.
