To truly liberate the slaves and give them a fresh economic start by giving them land the government would have been required th
e slaves and give them a fresh economic start by giving them land the government would have been required to do what? why were the politicians unwilling to do this?
In this scenario, the government would have been forced to take land from white farmers and give it to newly freed slaves.
Many politicians were unwilling to confiscate land from white farmers to give it to blacks farmers because they felt this was a violation of American citizens natural rights. During this time period, ownership of land was seen as extremely valuable as agriculture was still the main source of income for most American families. By taking away someone's land and giving it to someone else, politicians felt that they would be creating an extremely powerful and tryannical federal government. This is why the government never takes farm land and gives it to newly freed African American citizens.
They went on safety systems, being resourceful on food and water +live stock. They lowered payment for workers. They increased taxes. hope this helps :P
<span> think the answer your teachers are looking for is D, but I disagree. Both of these concepts date back to ancient Greece or earlier. They resurfaced around the 18th century. </span>
The decision of the court was read in March of 1857. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney -- a staunch supporter of slavery -- wrote the "majority opinion" for the court. It stated that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue.
The human race will not live in peace until people and nations learn that differences dont matter. Some conflict can teach people different things. But it can get to the point of getting harmful when noone sees the others side of things. Peace will almost always eliminate injustice.
