The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
Answer: The answer is B, It’s better to be the murderer than to be the murdered because of the “doubtful joy”.
Explanation: Just took a test and it was the right answer.
Answer:
this has been coming of age because a lot of teens have had to mature during this pandemic because of learning from home and lots of other factors.
Explanation:
It is A because the cruise in ship is supposed to be capitalized
Answer:
Rainsford is an avid hunter at the start of the story, believing that man is superior to animals, that his prey has no feelings, and that hunting in general is just a game. He believes that the world is divided into two parts: the hunter and the hunted. This opinion changes when he discovers Zaroff intends to use him as prey. When Rainsford accepts that he must play Zaroff's "game," he begins to resemble Zaroff. When he kills Zaroff's dog and then Ivan, he becomes a serial killer. Rainsford kills Zaroff by the end of the story, and we don't know if he has become like Zaroff.