You should begin by gathering textual evidence. With the textual evidence, you will be able to provide quotes that will help support your analysis.
Answer: flowing freely or in great quantity.
Explanation: hope it helps 1 is the answer
The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Answer:
This is the book that I have found in the box; <em>whose </em>is it
Explanation:
by saying this <em>is</em> the book I have found in the box, we know that we will not be asking "where" is it (because it <em>is </em>here)
we are not asking "whom" is it, because that would mean we are asking about who the book is ('who' being a person; the book is not a person)
we are not asking "when" is it, because that is not grammatically correct or logical
so, we are asking "<em>whose </em>is it"
hope this helps!!
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Long is the only adjective, for "dirt road" is a noun in itself. If they were seperated with commas, Ex. "That was a happy, merry song!" then they would be coordinating adjectives.
