The federalist felt that a bill of rights did not need to be added to the constitution. The anti-federalist, on the other hands,
said if a bill of rights was not added to the constitution they would not sign it. 1) explain why each side felt this particular way
2) identify which side won the argument
3) describe why they won the argument using evidence
1) The federalist felt a bill of rights did not need to be added because they had the 7 prinples The Anti-federalist felt the bill of right s should be added because they felt that the national government was going to be too strong
2) The Anti-federalist won
3) the anti federalists one because the federalists needed the anti federalists to sign the Constitution
Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct responses would be "new information comes to light" and "old theories are discredited". </span>
