1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fiasKO [112]
3 years ago
15

The federalist felt that a bill of rights did not need to be added to the constitution. The anti-federalist, on the other hands,

said if a bill of rights was not added to the constitution they would not sign it.
1) explain why each side felt this particular way
2) identify which side won the argument
3) describe why they won the argument using evidence
History
1 answer:
tatiyna3 years ago
7 0
1) The federalist felt a bill of rights did not need to be added because they had the 7 prinples
The Anti-federalist felt the bill of right s should be added because they felt that the national government was going to be too strong

2) The Anti-federalist won


3) the anti federalists one because the federalists needed the anti federalists to sign the Constitution
You might be interested in
CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTION PLEASE ! Thank You
Karolina [17]

1) The History tells was of our past .2) Learnt from the past is our careless ness.
5 0
3 years ago
Technically an aboriginal is someone who
Hitman42 [59]
An Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander is a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and is accepted as such by the community in which he (she) lives.
7 0
3 years ago
What forced the u.s. to end isolationism and enter wwii?
Dahasolnce [82]
A. the japanese attack on pearl harbor
6 0
3 years ago
All Roman laws were first voted on by the Assembly of the
Mariana [72]

Answer:

select   A. Tribes

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZZZZ ANSWER ASAP!!!! 20 POINTS!!!
Xelga [282]
1. Absolute monarchy, or absolutism, meant that the ultimate authority to run a state was in the hands of a king who ruled by divine right. Divine right was the claim that a king was given his position by some higher power. ... Because kings and queens were given their authority by god, their power was unconditional
2. An oligarchy is a power structure that allows a few businesses, families, or individuals to rule. They have enough power to turn the county to benefit them to the exclusion of other members. They maintain their power through their relationships with each other.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does an opportunity cost differ from a trade-off?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these statements correctly expresses a similarity between ancient india and ancient china?
    6·2 answers
  • What event convinced the soviet union to join the allies?
    15·1 answer
  • Are ants prehistoric
    12·1 answer
  • He doesn't know what side he's on. First he pledged
    10·2 answers
  • One of samuel slater's contributions to the development of american business was the use of
    5·1 answer
  • Approximately what percentage of the north/ south was African American in population?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the akkadian empire change the political structure of the fertile crescent?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the purpose of canned food drives?
    8·2 answers
  • In which Asian nations do the people play the greatest role in deciding who the rulers are and what decisions are made? A. China
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!