The correct answer is impoundment.
The Impoundment of appropriated funds is one of those ideas that has mostly gone away. A law was passed after it was perceived that President Nixon was abusing the impoundment powers.
Presidents are more likely to now use a line-item veto to accomplish a similar end to impoundment.
Answer:
Social Issues and Community Interactions
This chapter examines social issues involved in the siting and operation of waste-incineration facilities (such as incinerators and industrial boilers and furnaces), including possible social, economic, and psychological effects of incineration and how these might influence community interactions and estimates of health effects. Issues with respect to perceptions and values of local residents are also considered. In addition, this chapter addresses risk communication issues and approaches for involving the general public to a greater extent in siting and other decisions concerning incineration facilities. The committee recognized at the outset of its study that the social, economic, and psychological effects for a particular waste-incineration facility might be favorable, neutral, or adverse depending on many site-specific conditions and characteristics. However, the current state of understanding for many issues considered in this chapter is such that little or no data specific to waste incineration were available for analysis by the committee. In such cases, the committee identified key issues that should be addressed in the near future.
The social, psychological, and economic impacts of incineration facilities on their locales are even less well documented and understood than the health effects of waste incineration. When environmental-impact assessments are required for proposed federal or state actions, they typically must include socioeconomic-impact assessments, but the latter are often sketchy at best. They also might be given short shrift in the decision-making process (Wolf 1980; Freudenburg 1989; Rickson et al. 1990). Furthermore, these socioeconomic assessments attempt to be prospective—that is, they assess the likely effects of proposed actions. Little research has been done to evaluate systematically the socioeco-
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Social Issues and Community Interactions." National Research Council. 2000. Waste Incineration and Public Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/5803.×
Add a note to your bookmark
nomic impacts of controversial waste-treatment or waste-disposal facilities that have been in place for several years or more (Finsterbusch 1985; Seyfrit 1988; English et al. 1991; Freudenburg and Gramling 1992). Moreover, the committee is not aware of any studies of the effects of removing an established incinerator. One reason for the lack of cumulative, retrospective socioeconomic-impact research is the lack of sufficient data. Although incineration facilities must routinely monitor and record emissions of specified pollutants, health-monitoring studies before or after a facility begins operation are only rarely performed, and periodic studies of the socioeconomic impacts of a facility over time are virtually nonexistent, partly because of methodological problems (Armour 1988) and the absence of regulations that necessitate continued monitoring of socioeconomic impacts.
Explanation:
A group environment that promotes arousal and anonymity would be the ideal social context for deindividuation
<h3 /><h3>What is the social context?</h3>
The specific circumstance or broad context that serves as a model for a person's or a group's behavior. The background usually has a minimal impact on the actions and feelings that occur in this environment.
When people feel they can't be individually recognized, a phenomenon known as deindividuation occurs, which manifests as impulsive, aberrant, and occasionally aggressive behavior.
In this, the people may act the way in which the surrounding environment is behaving.
Learn more about the social context, here:
brainly.com/question/21208547
#SPJ4
Answer:
It should be work and time.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Ethic standards are a set of guideline, principle or lay down rule within an organisation or any profession which acts as a footnote to all members to promote values, guide a person's and business's operational behaviour to avoid confusions during the course of their activities. Ethic standards or code differ from one organisation and institution to another. However, some ethical principles such as accountability, fairness, autonomy( consent), honesty, transparency etc are ethical principles perspective general to almost all organisation and institution.
Therefore from Milgram's study approach, it could be deduced that his method of research was based on misinformation and participants was not fully informed on the basic of the study conduct. Participants in any study must give their consent to any observation, participation before any study can be considered proper, legit or conducted in an appropriate manner.
<em>So, the study conducted by Milgram's would not likely be approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) today because the current ethical standards include having the researcher provide informed consent to participants before the study started, as well as to avoid causing any possible psychological harm to the participants and having incorrect data from such study.</em>
