I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
Answer:
Fads can have a positive impact on people's lives.
The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels ends with the phrase "Workers of all countries, unite!"
Answer:
Catch or caught in terms of "attract or fix": The glint of the gold caught my eye.
Hi there!
<em>In the movie The Crucible, the Putnam’s were shown in their buggy because it showed the status and how they lived. </em>
<em>Their attitude toward the less fortunate is like a why-are-you-here type.</em>
In The Crucible, the members of the Putnam's family were important and wealthy members of Salem’s community. They helped spread the witchcraft hysteria by encouraging their daughter to accuse innocent citizens of colluding with the devil.
Hope this helps!
