<span>The type of error in this sentence is dangling construction. The phrase by calling every hour is a dangling modifier because it doesn't clearly state what word it describes. The way it is written, the phrase is modifying the word my mother, whereas it should refer to Jamie, because he was the one who is calling, and not the mother.</span>
I’m guessing C since the first excerpt is like a list of the regulations and the second excerpt mentions the “panic” of the regulations and the quarantine measures put in place hope this helps :)
It has been frequently and rightly remarked that the Crito is unique among
Plato’s dialogues insofar as its primary concern is what Socrates ought to do.
2
Most interpreters assume that Socrates ought to do what seems best to his reason (Cr 46b3-6); thus, most interpretations defend the rationality of obedience
or disobedience. On my account, it is not at all obvious that Socrates ought to
do what seems best to his reason. On my account, Socrates does not do what
seems best to his reason because he does not reason about whether he should
obey the laws; he simply obeys the laws. Doubtless, this claim seems counterintuitive to many; after all, does not Socrates articulate and defend his reasons
for remaining in prison from 49c to 54c? Is it not the cogency of Socrates’ reasons
for remaining in prison that have been so thoroughly debated in the scholarship summarized below? My answer to both of these questions is ‘no.’ Perhaps
counter-intuitively I claim that the reasons for remaining in prison, from Crito
49c to54c, are not Socrates’ reasons; they are the arguments of the speaking laws
of Athens
Answer:
Then tell me about ur self so I can help write it I can't write a personal essay about u if I don't know u
Answer:
He wants the reader to know that it is them doing that part
Explanation:
