The options are:
a). Nebergall is an armchair Mars enthusiast with a career as a business analyst.
b). Nebergall argues convincingly that Mars is the last, best hope for the survival of humanity.
c). I think that Nebergall is a brilliant scientist who needs to be recognized.
d). Nebergall avoids using pathos in his essay.
Answer:
b). Nebergall argues convincingly that Mars is the last, best hope for the survival of humanity.
Explanation:
The introduction of any literary work primarily aims to clarify the topic to the readers, state its importance, thesis, grab readers' interest and attention, and highlight the key focus that the author will throw light upon.
In the given essay, <u>the second option most adequately enhances the introduction as it clearly states the key argument of the author that how credibly 'Mars is the last yet most effective alternate for human survival</u>.' This would not only inform the readers about the author's viewpoint but also capture their interest. The description of the use of the data establishes the logical validity of the claim and supports the author's claim. Thus, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
C) Twists and surprises
This is the best answer because a novel has more space and time to build up surprises and twists in the plot than a short story.
The adaption they use is literary adaption in which the authors in which they adapt a literary source to another genre.
The usefulness of the interpretation standard in your other classes is that it would help you understand office communication and how to send letters and memos to staff members.
<h3>What is the Interpretation Standard?</h3>
This refers to the use of letters or memo that is used in an office setting to give responses to queries.
Hence, we can see that with the knowledge of standard interpretations, you would be able to understand office communication and how to send letters and memos to staff members.
Read more about letters and memos here:
brainly.com/question/27337302
#SPJ1
Both are a number (6) multiplied by a variable (z).
However, 6z is the correct way to write this.
We usually write the number first, that's just the way it's done.
It sort of makes sense because 6z is literally equal to 6 z's.
