1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tankabanditka [31]
3 years ago
9

Please help with this.

History
2 answers:
Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago
7 0
My pp daddy’s girl in my car so I’m going home now I’m going home and
lidiya [134]3 years ago
4 0
Please Help you with what
You might be interested in
What were the causes and effects of the war in 1812
Ann [662]
The british actions to prevent trade with U.s and france
4 0
2 years ago
What were the principal values and ideals of the Pilgrims?
alexira [117]

Option A is the right answer that piety, courage, and industry were the principal values and ideals of the Pilgrims.

Piety is an intense admiration for God and the explanation of one's religion through spiritual practice. courage for pilgrims meant the contrast between living and dying. they believed that individuals who maintain high personal courage would have been ready to leave their places to travel to an unexplored country.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I will give you brainliest if you give an actual answer
Helga [31]
Certain rights and structures of government written into the U.S. Constitution can be traced directly to various documents or events created by the English. The English Magna Carta helped to develop the idea of the rule of law.
4 0
3 years ago
Plz answer these two questions
topjm [15]
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values." These are one of the reasons why they should promote democracy aboard
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one role that third parties have played within the American political party system?
Yuliya22 [10]
Third parties are usually focused on one issue, basically forcing the democratic party and the republican party to also talk about these issues.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the United States want to achieve in their society?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the name of the theory that said that if one country in a region fell to Communism others would surely follow
    8·1 answer
  • List some health risks of being overweight.
    10·2 answers
  • How did regional geography influence the economic development of the original thirteen<br> colonies?
    7·2 answers
  • Is data are reliable method for predicting the future why or why not?
    13·1 answer
  • The Magna Carta was an English legal charter that was issued in 1215. Its basic principle required the king of England to follow
    9·2 answers
  • Think about the issues during Industrialization: poverty,government corruption,Labor issues, family issues. What we're the cause
    11·1 answer
  • How do Buddhism and Hinduism compare to or affect your way of life? You can choose to focus on one or both. Anything will hep
    13·1 answer
  • Which economic system does the scenario
    5·1 answer
  • What the answer question
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!