The two persons indicated above (Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams) were at some point in the history of America presidential candidates. One of them went on to win the elections because of their economic backgrounds. See the explanation below.
<h3>How were Adams and Jackson's backgrounds different, and how did they compare to those of earlier presidents?</h3>
The process of choosing a president in America altered in the year 1807. Only wealthy men could vote in prior elections, and as a result, whomever promised greater riches was chosen president.
The sort of candidate who won the election changed once the average person was allowed to vote in 1807.
Because the average person could vote in the election of 1828, they took advantage of the chance and chose whoever they believed would benefit them. As can be seen, the candidate who was more relatable to the electorate prevailed.
Overall, Jackson was favored over Adams by the populace because he could connect with them better and represented the American ideal.
Learn more about Andrew Jackson:
brainly.com/question/340840
#SPJ1
Answer:
Prussian officer Friedrich Wilhelm Baron von Steuben developed a simplified system of drill and discipline during the Valley Forge encampment of 1777-1778 that helped to forge the Continental Army into an effective fighting force.
The answer would be coffee
The correct answer is veto.
A veto is the ability of the president to reject a law. For example, if the Senate and House of Representatives pass a law they need the president to sign it. The president can refuse to sign it which results in a veto. Then the only way the law would be implemented into American society would be by having the Senate and House of Representatives vote on it again. If both houses vote this law into place with a 2/3rd vote, then this would become law without the presidents help. This process is known as an override.
