The American Indian Wars were battles between American settlers and western Indians. Indians were also a key factor in the imperial rivalries among France, Spain, and England.But eighteenth-century conflicts were not limited to the European wars for empire. In Virginia and the Carolina, English-speaking colonists pushed aside many Indian tribes. When the Treaty of Paris was established it created conflict between whites and tribes. The Indians in the US were seen as a total waste of space.
The holocaust were Jewish slaved taken by the Germans to be tested on or just plainly tortured, those actions eventually led up to the Geneva convention
Johnson
Soon after the death of Lincoln, the war ended in 1865, as Andrew Johnson took the lead of the country trying to conciliate with the South. This caused a movement of people to the South, where within a year, they regained the power they had previously lost with the war. Naturally, the term carpetbagger is peyoraitve,and it was referred to Johnson and his Republican companions seen as opportunists. They plan was to be elected after the civil war came to an end. They sought approval from the South, where they were rather unpopular. The word is still sometimes in use in the United States referring to candidates for elections presented by their political parties in electoral areas with few or non-existent popularity.
Answer: a. separation of powers
Further detail/explanation:
The "Separation of Powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.
Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.
