1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LiRa [457]
3 years ago
6

List the order of the events that led to ratification of the Constitution.

History
1 answer:
Masteriza [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

List the order of the events that led to ratification of the Constitution. ●The Constitutional Convention ●The Great Compromise ●Federalist Papers●Ratification of the Constitution

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of the following developments is an example of globalization
STALIN [3.7K]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with "customer support centers for American companies" being based overseas, since this shows the extent of corporate and national interconnectedness. </span></span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The amendment process would allow state governments to nullify federal law
marta [7]

Answer:

The rights of citizens would be better protected by having both federal and state levels of government.

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
What was jonh f. Kennedy program know as
Semmy [17]

If I am not mistaken, it was the space program also know as the Apollo Program a.k.a  Project Apollo

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Farmers and laborers made up the Sumerian
Sergio [31]

Answer:

<em><u>Working Class</u></em>

<em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em><em><u>•</u></em>

7 0
3 years ago
How did Mandela’s tactics differ from Gandhi’s? (Gandhi believed in nonviolent protest)
nadezda [96]

SIMILARITIES —The depth of oppression in South Africa created Nelson Mandela, a revolutionary par excellence, and many others like him: Oliver Tambo, Walter Sisulu, Albert Lutuli, Yusuf Dadoo and Robert Sobukwe — all men of extraordinary courage, wisdom, and generosity. In India, too, thousands went to jail or kissed the gallows, in their crusade for freedom from the enslavement that was British rule. In The Gods are Athirst, Anatole France, the French novelist, seems to say to all: “Behold out of these petty personalities, out of these trivial commonplaces, arise, when the hour is ripe, the most titanic events and the most monumental gestures of history.”

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi spent his years in prison in line with the Biblical verse, “Rejoice in hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer.” Nelson Mandela was shut off from his countrymen for 27 years, imprisoned, until his release on February 11, 1990. Both walked that long road to freedom. Their unwavering commitment to nationalism was not only rooted in freedom; it also aspired towards freedom. Both discovered that after climbing a great hill, one only finds many more to climb. They had little time to rest and look back on the distance they had travelled. Both Mandela and the Mahatma believed freedom was not pushed from behind by a blind force but that it was actively drawn by a vision. In this respect, as in many other ways, the convergence of the Indian and South African freedom struggles is real and striking.

Racial prejudice characterised British India before independence as it marred colonial rule in South Africa. Gandhi entered the freedom struggle without really comprehending the sheer scale of racial discrimination in India. When he did, however, he did not allow himself to be rushed into reaction. The Mahatma patiently used every opportunity he got to defy colonial power, to highlight its illegitimate rule, and managed to overcome the apparently unassailable might of British rule. Gandhi’s response to the colonial regime is marked not just by his extraordinary charisma, but his method of harnessing “people power.”

Nelson Mandela used similar skills, measuring the consequences of his every move. He organised an active militant wing of the African National Congress — the Spear of the Nation — to sabotage government installations without causing injury to people. He could do so because he was a rational pragmatics.

DIFFERENCES—Both Gandhi and Nelson Mandela are entitled to our affection and respect for more than one reason. They eschewed violence against the person and did not allow social antagonisms to get out of hand. They felt the world was sick unto death of blood-spilling, but that it was, after all, seeing a way out. At the same time, they were not pacifists in the true sense of the word. They maintained the evils of capitulation outweighed the evils of war. Needless to say, their ideals are relevant in this day and age, when the advantages of non-violent means over the use of force are manifest.

Gandhi and Mandela also demonstrated to the world they could help build inclusive societies, in which all Indians and South Africans would have a stake and whose strength, they argued, was a guarantee against disunity, backwardness and the exploitation of the poor by the elites. This idea is adequately reflected in the make-up of the “Indian” as well as the “South African” — the notion of an all-embracing citizenship combined with the conception of the public good.

At his trial, Nelson Mandela, who had spent two decades in the harsh conditions of Robben Island, spoke of a “democratic and free society in which all persons live in harmony and with equal opportunities. […] It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve, but if need be, an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

The speed with which the bitterness between former colonial subjects and their rulers abated in South Africa is astonishing. Mandela was an ardent champion of “Peace with Reconciliation,” a slogan that had a profound impact on the lives of ordinary people. He called for brotherly love and integration with whites, and a sharing of Christian values. He did not unsettle traditional dividing lines and dichotomies; instead, he engaged in conflict management within a system that permitted opposing views to exist fairly.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many years can a senator serve in the Georgia General Assembly?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not part of Johnson's strategy for fighting the war in Vietnam?:
    8·1 answer
  • The defeat of president franklin d. Roosevelt's "court packing" plan by congress is an example
    6·1 answer
  • How much did the United States pay for the Louisiana Purchase? A) $10 million B) $5 million C) $20 million D) $15 million
    14·2 answers
  • Which is a characteristic of the "Cold War" period in the United States?
    5·1 answer
  • What principles of the revolution would appeal to Salomon and other Jewish people
    9·2 answers
  • Discoveries of artistic works from early men and women include all of these except
    7·1 answer
  • Which colonial leader founded Georgia as a place where debtors could settle?
    11·1 answer
  • Describe what life was like for working class children during the Industrial Revolution?
    7·2 answers
  • During the Great Depression, what
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!