1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
3 years ago
10

Who is a more integral character in The Giver novel, Jonas or The Giver?

English
2 answers:
3241004551 [841]3 years ago
8 0
This is a hard question. In a sense they're both very important. Without the giver Jonas wouldn't have received any memories. The Giver is essential to the story. So is Jonas though. Without him there would be no receiver and the memories wouldn't have been released to the community and the giver wouldn't have been able to pass down the memories.
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
7 0
Jonas because he is an essential key

You might be interested in
Can someone plz help a fellow out !
irga5000 [103]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

a chronology is the order of events based on when they happened

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about sentence structure is FALSE?
lukranit [14]

Answer:

the last one.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When she says don't put your life on hold for me?
hichkok12 [17]
When who says it? that women is sweet.
5 0
3 years ago
Chapter 17 the prince
belka [17]

Machiavelli discusses the relationship between cruelty, compassion, and the behavior of an effective prince. He returns to Cesare Borgia as an example of effective behavior. Cesare, states Machiavelli, ruled a prosperous and stable domain despite a reputation for cruelty.

An effective prince must try to gain a reputation for compassion but also be willing to be cruel when the stability of his domain calls for it. However, even when a situation requires cruelty, Machiavelli warns that the prince should not act too quickly. Even if a prince has a reputation for cruelty, Machiavelli claims that this will not lead to his downfall.

Whereas being cruel to the people is acceptable if it cannot be avoided, Machiavelli claims that being cruel as a military leader is indispensable. Being lenient toward soldiers can lead only to bad consequences, according to Machiavelli. To illustrate this, he gives the contrasting examples of the famous Carthaginian general Hannibal and the famous Roman general Scipio Africanus. Hannibal's troops endured great hardship under his command because they knew to disobey him meant death. In contrast, Scipio's armies disobeyed and mutinied because they knew that he was hesitant to punish them.

3 0
3 years ago
Any help, you have to match it with the W's then it spells a code
kotegsom [21]

Washington, Harvard, and New Mexico go in where :))

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ANSWER THIS I'LL GIVE U A BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
  • What were the benefits of the arms race?
    12·2 answers
  • (I NEED THIS ANSWERED QUICKLY! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO FIRST CORRECT ANSWER!)
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following topic sentences has the strongest voice? Soda should be banned from schools because it makes people fat.
    11·1 answer
  • The reconciliation of Montague and capulet is
    12·1 answer
  • Amella had practiced her speech for weeks, and when she delivered it, she could sense that she had all of the students'
    11·1 answer
  • Write down ten agentless passive sentences.​
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the central theme of the text?
    8·2 answers
  • Explain the theme of the folktale "The People Could Fly."
    5·2 answers
  • What does Douglass think of the Underground Railroad? Why? Discuss
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!