Answer:
Other familiar devices is what is referred to as the term in question. Other familiar devices are the laws that help in prescribing the structure of executive agencies and personnel policies regarding hiring, promotion, and dismissal.
This laws are usually strictly complied to as the due processes involved in the hiring, promotion and dismissal must be followed to avoid human right breach or nepotism.
This is valid, as the premise does mention Vernon. Since deductive reasoning can be either valid or invalid; but, inductive reasoning is neither valid or invalid, it leaves a deductive reasoning.
A is obviously incorrect unless it's a family business
b) is correct because the supervisor ranks over the employee
c) is incorrect because it implies they are equal
d) is incorrect because they are both still working
Only b is correct - a vertical relationship
To calculate the percentage increase: First: work out the difference (increase) between the two numbers you are comparing. Then: divide the increase by the original number and multiply the answer by 100. If your answer is a negative number then this is a percentage decrease.
Answer:
a. the fundamental attribution error.
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various sociologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is consistent with the fundamental attribution error. This is a concept that states that individuals tend to emphasize other people internal characteristics/aspects rather than external factors, when explaining people behaviors/actions. Which is what Ralph is doing by immediately assuming the customer is an "idiot".
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.