Can you list the questions? If the author is the narrative then look at what he thinks, automatically if he is THE NARRATOR. He would be using first person pov. If he is using the terms I, We= first person
You= second person
He, She, It, They= third person
From my opinion, it is always highly recommended that we must know a second language always for better understanding of sake. There are a lots of advantages of learning a second language rather than our regular spoken language. Having a second language helps us to develop more problem solving skills, analytical techniques, critical thinking, improved memory and understanding new grammatical rules and vocabulary. Knowing a second language makes us more enough confident and intelligent than others. Suppose for example, we are traveling to a different country or region in which we are not familiar with their language spoken there i.e it may be (French, Spanish, Italian, Mexican..) then we'll be definitely trying using translator devices. Rather than these occupations, knowing a second language helps to understand better and identify their culture and tradition even more deep. This helps to develop mutual understanding between the people whom we talk in their language and we get to know and understand things even more better. It will also help us to travel in any corner of the world too without any fear of languages. So do try to learn new language is the best and epic hack and life skill which lasts long forever!
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation:
A. The evidence is relevant because it shows that people interacting through technology are often rude.
