Answer:
They called them coyotes! This was a term associated with 'trickster' in pre-Hispanic folklore - and with an animal that raids and steals by night.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
Scarcity refers to the condition of insufficiency where the human beings are incapable to full fill their wants in sufficient manner. In other words, it is a situation of fewer resources in comparison to unlimited human wants. Human wants are unlimited. we may satisfy some of our wants but soon new wants arise. It is impossible to produce goods and services so as to satisfy all wants of people. Thus scarcity explains the relationship between limited resources and unlimited wants and the problem there in.
Answer: cities were destroyed, gold was taken, civilization was just about gone, so since those occurred not much more than archeologist produce this fact
Explanation:
Sorry can't help you, but you can look it up on google
