<span>The document that was added to the constitution to gain the support of anti-federalists was called the Bill of Rights.
I hope this helps! :)</span>
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
The event that has been of greatest benefit to Latin America, was the battle that Simón Bolivar waged for the liberation of the peoples of the south, several countries of Latin America functioned as Spanish viceroyalties, and were ruled under Spanish law, their lands, wealth and benefits were used by foreigners, and although Simon Bolivar comes from Spanish parents, he decided to fight to liberate countries such as Venezuela, Peru, Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador and Panama, those battles were the most important in the history of South America, they served to open the doors to Independence of the south, autonomy and the recovery of identity.
Batu khan originally established the khanate of the golden horede
Answer:
Explanation:
So, the question is, what is Mercantilism?
Simply, Mercantilism is a policy, through which a country tries to protect its own businesses from the competition with other countries.
This policy encourages maximizing export and minimizing imports.
During the colonial era, countries like France, Great Britain implemented it using their political authority.
So, now let’s come back to our own topic.
Far around hundred years before the rebellion began, in the years 1651, 1660, and 1663 the English parliament passed some acts, popular as the ‘Navigation Acts’ in history.
As per those acts, only British ships were allowed to bring goods to the 13 colonies of America.
