First, there were two independent clinical psychologists who were present or on call 24 hours a day. They had the power to intervene and to remove anyone from the study if they thought they were in distress.
Second, we had paramedics and security guards on hand and ready to intervene at a moment’s notice if anything untoward happened in the study.
Third, the study was constantly monitored by members of a five-person independent ethics panel. This was chaired by a Member of Parliament and also included members of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Howard League for Penal Reform, the BBC’s Independent Editorial Policy Unit and a senior academic psychologist. This committee had the power to change the way the study as a whole was run and to terminate it if they had ethical concerns.
http://www.bbcprisonstudy.org/bbc-prison-study.php?p=27
Answer:
Explanation:
Conclusion: Regard for and usage of human rights gives the premise to tranquil and amicable concurrence among people groups with various social and religious foundations. This decent variety of societies and religions improves the all-inclusive importance of human rights at the national and provincial dimensions.
