As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
Answer: social contract
Explanation: Because Ginny's mother has accompanied her daughter on multiple occasions she has both taught and tested her on the safety rules. Ginny has demonstrated mastery of them and consistency in their application. Consequently, Ginny agrees to follow the rules and in exchange her mother allows to go to the park unaccompanied.
Answer: sexism
Explanation:
john doesn't think women can do basic human stuff
The colonists would be upset, because many of the American colonists believed it was their birthright, and believed they deserved the lands.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed is the second option. Overpopulation tend to impact standard of living the most. It <span>is an undesirable condition where the number of existing human population exceeds the carrying capacity of Earth. If this happens, the resources would be scarce and that would affect standard of living. Hope this answers the question.</span>
