Answer:
A
Explanation:
A. is the only on that makes senses
Elie Wiesel believed that commemorating the Holocaust was not a job but an obligation and that the only way to combat lingering apathy worldwide was to share his own narrative as well as the stories of other victims.
Elie Wiesel discusses the shaky link between indifference and humanity throughout "The Perils of Indifference." He thought that those who chose to ignore the suffering and anguish occurring all around the world were endangering the very nature of mankind, and that the pervasive nature of indifference still posed the greatest challenge to a just and enduring peace.
<h3>
What did Elie Wiesel take out from the situation?</h3>
Everyone possesses bravery, faith, hope, and courage, and how they are used has an impact, as Elie Wiesel shows in Night. Elie accomplishes this by using the events that took place in Auschwitz. Everyone forgets to apply these crucial qualities when they are in pain occasionally.
Elie's identity underwent constant change as a result of the horrific events that the Jewish community endured.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel, visit
brainly.com/question/16258201
#SPJ4
I believe that the most dangerous animal in the world to hunt would be a a Cheetah. Cheetahs area fast making it harder for you to run away from it. If it spots you and thinks your dangerous it will chase you. Cheetahs also have great eyesight during day. Cheetahs can spot things from 5km away.
Answer:
While the Battle of Thermopylae was technically a defeat for the Greek coalition, it was also a conquest. It marked the beginning of several important Greek victories against the Persians and represented a morale shift among the Greeks. ... By its very nature, the Persian Empire was expansionistic.
Explanation: This is from edg i doubled check good luck!
There were many practices common among modernist poets, such as the following: insistent breaks with the immediate past, its different inventions, "making it new" with elements from culture remote in space and time, the questions of impersonality and objectivity, emphasizing the personal imagination, culture, emotions and memories of the poet. Intellectual statements which the world could relate to were more important than personal statements.
